Session 2 - Part I Processes of slow/steady energy release in the solar atmosphere and heliosphere
Date: |
Monday, September 10, 2012 |
Time: |
16:00 - 18:00 |
Seq
|
|
Time
|
|
Title
|
|
Abs No
|
|
1 |
|
16:00
|
|
Heating of the solar corona: An observational perspective
Warren, Harry
NRL, UNITED STATES
The temperature structure of the solar corona holds
many important clues as to how the solar atmosphere is heated. Recent
observations with EIS/Hinode and AIA/SDO have shown that well
constrained temperature measurements can be made over a wide range of
solar conditions. In this talk I will present results from a systematic
study of the differential emission measure distribution in 15 active
region cores. We focus on measurements in the “inter-moss”
region, that is, the region between the loop footpoints, where the
observations are easier to interpret. To reduce the uncertainties at
the highest temperatures we present a new method for isolating the Fe
XVIII emission in the AIA/SDO 94 channel. The resulting differential
emission measures show that the temperature distribution in an active
region core is often strongly peaked near 4MK, suggesting that these
loops are close to equilibrium. We will compare these results to the
analysis of evolving million degree loops, which show a similar,
sharply peaked temperature distribution.
|
|
Invited talk |
|
2 |
|
16:30
|
|
Heating of the solar corona: modeling perspective
Gudiksen, B.
Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, Oslo, Norway
Abstract:
The solar corona is at a glance a simpel physical
domain. There is no complications due to radiation, the magnetic field
is dominating the dynamics everywhere and we know that the corona is
heated by a process that is tightly connected to the magnetic field. In
spite of the relatively simple physics involved, we still do not even
know which heating mechanism or mechanisms are responsible for
maintaining the coronal plasma at several million degrees Kelvin. The
responsible culprit is the dynamics of the magnetic field and the
driver that injects energy into the magnetic field which is then
released as heat in the corona.
Numerical modeling has within the last few years become a realistic
tool to help resolve this question, but modelling is made difficult by
the fact that in order to answer any questions about the corona, it is
necessary to include deeper layers of the atmosphere to account for the
forcing of the magnetic field. Here we still need more observational
data to get the forcing correct and verifying the simulations.
I will give an overview of the modelling effort to date, the
complications models face and the problems in verifying the modelling
results.
|
|
Invited talk |
|
3 |
|
17:00
|
|
Ejection of cool plasma into the corona - comparison of 1D and 3D coronal loop models
Zacharias, P.1; Bingert, S.2; Peter, H.2
1ISSI, SWITZERLAND;
2MPS, GERMANY
The formation and subsequent ejection of cool transition
region plasma into the corona will be discussed, as observed in our
three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (3D MHD) model of the solar
corona. To investigate the dynamics of the ejection, a comparison
between the 3D MHD model and a 1D loop model will be presented. In
addition, observations from Hinode/EIS and SDO/AIA will be compared to
the output of the numerical models.
In the 3D case, the pressure gradient acting upon the
plasma is the main driver of the ejection. The pressure gradient is
caused by a heating event that takes place just above the chromosphere
following Ohmic dissipation of currents that have been produced through
braiding of magnetic field lines by photospheric plasma motions.
The parameters extracted from the 3D model serve as
input parameters for the 1D loop model. A heating pulse is injected at
different heights along the loop with varying amplitude and width to
mimic the situation in 3D prior to the ejection.
As a consequence, the heating rate is strongly
increased in a localized area and leads to enhanced evaporation of
material that causes the material to rise. In contrast to earlier
studies, where similar heating events lead to both transition region
redshifts and coronal blueshifts, our parameter study shows consistent
blueshifts along the loop and almost no redshifts. In particular, we do
not see the transition region plasma being pushed down significantly
following the heating event. We will discuss these findings in terms of
the mass cycle between the chromosphere and corona.
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
17:20
|
|
Outflow Velocity Structure in the Upper Transition Region and Corona
Gabriel, A.1; Abbo, L.2
1Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, FRANCE;
2INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, ITALY
A study of the outflow velocity field in the quiet corona and
coronal hole has been carried out using the EIS spectrometer on board
the satellite Hinode. This concentrates on the temperature range from
the upper transition region to the base of the true corona. The first
part, the subject of a preliminary publication, treats the fine-scale
structure of this field. The statistics of this structure strongly
supports a model of coronal heating and wind acceleration due to
stochastic magnetic reconnection low down in the transition region. To
extend this to a larger scale, involving hole / non-hole flows,
requires an absolute calibration of the velocity zero. This poses
important difficulties for the instrument EIS, particularly for the low
luminosity regions of the quiet corona and coronal holes. With this
calibration, we are in a position to integrate the fine scale structure
into an overall velocity structure. This leads to a clearer
understanding of the relation between small-scale transition region
reconnection and the onset region of the solar wind.
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
17:40
|
|
Interchange Reconnection in a Turbulent Corona
Rappazzo, A. F.1; Matthaeus, W. H.1; Ruffolo, D.2; Servidio, S.3; Velli, M.4
1University of Delaware, UNITED STATES;
2Mahidol University, THAILAND;
3Universita' della Calabria, ITALY;
4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, UNITED STATES
Magnetic reconnection at the interface between coronal holes
and loops, so-called interchange reconnection, can release the hotter and denser plasma from the magnetically confined
regions into the heliosphere contributing to the formation ofthe highly variable slow solar wind.
While it has been shown that it must take place, e.g., to explain the quasi-rigid rotation of
holes in presence of the underlying photospheric differential rotation, we know very little of how interchange reconnection
actually occurs. In order to understand its dynamics we have performed high-resolution reduced MHD simulations in Cartesian
geometry (with a straightened out coronal loop next to an open region) of the interface region between open and closed
corona. This boundary is not
stationary, becomes fractal, and field-lines change
connectivity continuously, becoming alternatively open and
closed. We will discuss quantitatively the implications for
coronal heating and sources of the solar wind.
Furthermore, we are able for the first time to include
(self-consistently) fluctuations in the coronal magnetic
field, naturally generated by photospheric convection.
This is of crucial importance, in fact even small fluctuations
in the super-radially expanding magnetic field at the boundary
between coronal holes and streamers allow field-lines random
walk, diffusing the plasma injected from coronal loops into
the heliosphere away from the heliospheric current sheet, as
observed in situ. In this way all the boundary between open
and closed region is a source of slow wind, unlike current
models that limit its source to few special boundary sections,
a small fraction of the whole boundary.
|
|
|
|