Session - Modelling the Earth's ionosphere and solutions to counter ionospheric threats to GNSS applications
Marcio Aquino, Alan Dodson (Monday) and Giorgiana De Franceschi, Vincenzo Romano (Tuesday)
The Earth's ionosphere is a complex system that is driven by many different factors such as solar radiation, electric and
magnetic fields, and neutral atmosphere dynamics. New models and data to realise the state of the Earth's ionosphere are
of interest to radio system users whose signals are affected by ionospheric propagation, in particular navigation and
communications systems operating below 3 GHz. Global Navigation Satellites Systems (GNSS), which have become essential
in support of a growing number of activities now embedded in modern society, are especially vulnerable to signal propagation
through the ionosphere. In this context this session addresses models and solutions to mitigate ionospheric threats to GNSS
and related applications. The TRANSMIT project, an FP7 funded Marie Curie Initial Training Network,
has focused on the understanding and development of new models that can be tested for their usefulness in
addressing radio system specification with a view to support the development of concepts and operational tools
that could contribute to a service to assist European users in countering GNSS vulnerability to ionospheric phenomena.
Results of this project are expected to be showcased in this session, as well as any other initiatives in this area.
The session welcomes work in the areas of ionospheric tomography and imaging, radio occultation, scintillation and
interference resilient receiver tracking models and implementations, real time positioning algorithms (e.g. for
Precise Point Positioning) to mitigate ionospheric threats affecting legacy and new GNSS signals, scintillation and
TEC prediction models and operational tools, as well as any other related topics. The main aim of the session is to
stimulate discussion and encourage new collaborative work.
Talks and First Class Posters
Monday November 17, 16:00 - 18:00, auditorium Rogier
Tuesday November 18, 09:00 - 10:50, auditorium Rogier
Poster Viewing
Monday November 17, 15:30-16:00, area in front of auditorium Rogier
The numbering of the posters can differ from the numbering in the overview without abstracts.
Talks and Highlighted Posters
More Posters
7 |
Poster |
|
Accuracy assessment of the GNSS
ionospheric corrections provided by the 3D data assimilation ionosphere model |
|
|
|
Solomentsev , Dmitry1; Khattatov, B2; Titov, A1; Cherniak, J1; Belokrylov, A3; Sorokin, S2 |
|
|
|
1Central
Aerological Observatory; 2National Research University of Information Technologies; 3Industrial Geodetic
Systems Ltd |
|
|
|
Obtaining the precise
ionospheric corrections for the navigation measurements is of great
importance for the GNSS professionals. Both single and multi-frequency GNSS
receivers suffer from the ionospheric signal delay. The amount of the signal
delay is dependent on the current ionosphere state in the vicinity of the
signal propagation path. The ionosphere itself is a complex unstable medium,
which is strongly forced by the external factors (such as neutral
thermosphere components and solar activity). These facts together make the
calculation of the ionospheric corrections for the GNSS measurements a
challenging and actual problem, which is still to be solved. The
three-dimensional data assimilation model of the ionosphere has been
developed by our team for the scientific research purposes. The data
assimilation system updates the first-principle model results with the GNSS
total electron content measurements, obtained from the variety of the
ground-based networks. During a long series of the model results validation
versus the independent observations (ionosondes, incoherent scatter radars,
satellite measurements etc) the model has shown high accuracy in estimation
of the ionospheric electron density in the altitude range from 80 to 20 00
km. The data assimilation model
results then have been applied to the GNSS corrections calculation. Since the
three-dimensional fields of electron density are available, the first and
second order errors were removed from the GNSS measurements in the
post-processing mode. After the data have been corrected, several positioning
algorithms including the RTKlib library were applied to obtain the precise
receiver position. The positioning results were then compared to the raw
measurements processing results, ionosphere-free combination results and the
Klobuchar model performance. The presented experiment results have shown that
the application of the ionospheric corrections, obtained from the data
assimilation model sufficiently increases the accuracy of the positioning
algorithms in a single frequency mode in comparison with raw measurements and
the Klobuchar model corrections. The results of the described comparisons
will be presented and discussed along with the data assimilation model
validation time series and the scientific applications examples. |
8 |
Poster |
|
Characterization of Ionospheric
Disturbances and their Relation to GNSS Positioning Errors at High Latitudes |
|
|
|
Jacobsen, K S1; Dähnn, M1 |
|
|
|
1Norwegian
Mapping Authority |
|
|
|
We present results from an
analysis of the distribution of ionospheric disturbances, measured by the
Rate Of TEC Index (ROTI), and their relation to Precise Point Positioning
(PPP) accuracy. The analysis is based on data for the entire year of 2012,
for 10 receivers at latitudes from 59 to 79 degrees North. PPP solutions were
computed using the GIPSY software. The
results show that elevated ROTI values occurs mainly in the cusp and
nightside auroral oval regions. Elevated ROTI values are more common in the
cusp, but in the nightside auroral oval they are stronger. The 3D position
error is strongly correlated with ROTI for receivers that are affected by
space weather, and increases exponentially with increasing ROTI. |
9 |
Poster |
|
Global Median Model of the
Ionospheric Critical Frequency foF2 Based on GPS Radio-Occultation and
Ground-Based Sounding Data |
|
|
|
Tsybulya, K1; Shubin, V2 |
|
|
|
1Fiodorov
Institute of Applied Geophysics; 2IZMIRAN |
|
|
|
Currently the most widely used
model of ionospheric parameters modeling is International Reference
Ionosphere (IRI). The model median of the F2 layer critical frequency (foF2)
was based mostly on ground-based ionospheric sounding data for the 1954–1964
period (CCIR coefficients) and the 1975-1979 period (URSI coefficients). The
network of ionospheric sounding stations is rather sparse and does not cover
the entire globe. In particular, ground-based stations are numerous in the
Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes but there are few of them near the equator
and in the Southern Hemisphere. Also, very few data points are available over
the oceans. We make an attempt to create an improved global median model for
the most important ionospheric parameter - the F2 layer critical frequency
foF2 using our experience with the SMF2 model for the F2 layer peak height
(hmF2). Both models are based, first of all, on GPS radio-occultation data
provided by receivers onboard satellites CHAMP (~300 000 foF2 values), GRACE (~100
000) and COSMIC (~3 500 000). These massive set of data was not available
when the CCIR and URSI coefficient sets were compiled. Also for the presented
model, foF2 series produced by 234 ground-based ionospheric sounders were
used to supplement the satellite data set for the 1957-2012 period. To
estimate the precision of the developed model we made comparisons with
independent data sets obtained in different seasons on ionospheric stations
on different latitudes. In general, the model gives smaller errors than IRI,
especially on low latitudes and in the Southern hemisphere. |
10 |
Poster |
|
Space weather case studies on
disturbed VLF radio propagation in the lower ionosphere |
|
|
|
Danielides, M1; Skripachev, V2 |
|
|
|
1Danielides
Space Science Consulting; 2Moscow State Technical University, Moscow Institute
Radiotechnics, Electronics and Automatics |
|
|
|
Since the early 20ies century
the importance of the condition of Earth ionosphere for long range radio
communication is known and presumable nowadays almost completely understood.
However, the development and especially the distribution of low-cost software
defined radio wave receivers (SDRs) is an on-going process and opens new
opportunities for investigating Earths lower ionosphere, utilizing globally
distributed VLF monitoring networks based on SDR technology. The aim of this presentation is i) to
compare some of the existing VLF receiver types and networks, ii) present the
InFlaMo network (www.inflamo.org) and its different SDR receivers, and iii)
show results of combined experiments of ground based instrumentation, e.g.
VLF transmitters, receivers and ionospheric heaters. Results from those case
studies are compared with an ionospheric fluid model. On outcome is that for
single locations of VLF receivers the daily and annual variations can now be
numerically forcasted. That enables us to make a quick and automated
nowcasting of space weather signatures from a broad VLF spectrum. |
11 |
Poster |
|
Augmentation of EGNOS Open
Service by Locally Adapted Ionospheric Model |
|
|
|
Vukovic, J1; Kos, T1 |
|
|
|
1University
of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing |
|
|
|
Global Navigation Satellite
Systems (GNSS) provide positioning, navigation and timing solutions that can
be used by users with different requirements. Performance of GNSS is affected
by several error sources and the ionosphere is recognized as the major one.
Ionospheric error varies depending on the time of day, season, position of
the receiver, solar activity and the Earth’s geomagnetic field. The
ionospheric error is quantified by the amount of Total Electron Content (TEC)
on the path between satellite and receiver. This error is frequency dependent
so it can be estimated using two frequencies in the satellite-receiver
communication. Vast majority of GNSS
receivers still uses only one frequency and they rely on global ionospheric
models to calculate and mitigate ionospheric error. Such models can perform well in
non-disturbed ionospheric conditions. However, in the time of high solar
activity and sudden ionospheric changes, single frequency GNSS receivers’
performance degrades severely. To overcome this problem, Satellite-Based
Augmentation Systems (SBAS) can be used. Using networks of dual-frequency
GNSS receivers the current ionospheric error over some region is estimated.
The calculated correction parameters are transmitted to the receivers by
geostationary satellites. European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service
(EGNOS) provides Safety-of-Life (SoL) service with emphasis on integrity,
primarily for usage in aviation, and Open Service (OS) with emphasis on
accuracy, intended for non-SoL usage. EGNOS OS coverage area extends over
most of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) region, but the eastern
border area remains uncovered. In case of ionospheric disturbances, coverage
is additionally disrupted because of lack of Ranging and Integrity Monitoring
Stations (RIMS) in that area. This
research identifies effects of different solar and geomagnetic conditions on
EGNOS ionospheric correction performance in middle latitudes, especially on
its eastern borders. The observed period is within the current solar cycle
24, as EGNOS OS became operational in 2009. The reference data are TEC
obtained from dual-frequency GNSS stations’ RINEX observation files. Such TEC
is affected by inter-frequency biases (IFB), produced by the receiver and the
satellites, and has to be calibrated before being used as a reference
value. After recognizing areas with
permanent or ionospheric-condition-dependent lack of EGNOS ionospheric
corrections, a solution with locally adapted ionospheric model is proposed.
Even though there are no RIMS stations in the recognized area, several GNSS
stations with publicly available data are situated there. Local reference TEC
can be used to modify a global ionospheric model in a way to adapt the model
to the local ionospheric conditions. The model of choice is NeQuick 2, a
global model able to compute ionospheric density between any two given
points, designed for simple and fast execution. The NeQuick 2 model can be
locally adapted if the local ionization level is used as a model input
instead of a solar flux index. Further research will determine the distance
from reference data source where such a locally fitted model would provide
the level of ionospheric correction similar to EGNOS, i.e. the area in which
it could augment EGNOS OS. |
12 |
Poster |
|
Characterization of Ionospheric
Effects and Investigation of their Influence on Current GNSS Observing System |
|
|
|
Cokrlic, M1; Galas, R1 |
|
|
|
1Technische
Universität Berlin |
|
|
|
Ionosphere has critical
influence on the trans-ionospheric communication- and navigation systems, and
thus it is one of the critical factor that has influence on the Global
Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Mitigation of the ionospheric threads is
one of the most interesting topics in the research and development area to
improve availability, reliability and precision of the GNSS systems. GNSS
signals, passing through the ionosphere, are affected by the free electrons
and can be refracted or dispersed. Thus they are carrying ionospheric
characteristics and signatures that can be isolated and studied. Because of
that and of the relatively low cost of the GNSS receivers, and availability
of the data from the already existing continuously operating reference GNSS
networks, studying and monitoring of the ionosphere on a global scale and
with high spatial- and time resolution become available. From the other side,
ionospheric perturbations can degrade accuracy of the positioning for more
than hundred meters and even make the PVT (position, velocity and time)
estimations impossible or false. Thus information about the state of the
ionosphere must be available in real time to enhance availability and to
improve navigation accuracy. The
state of the ionosphere can be characterized by a couple of basic parameters.
Some of them can be evaluated from GNSS observations: Total Electron Content
(TEC), Rate of TEC (ROT), Rate of change of TEC (ROTI), amplitude (S4) – and
phase (σφ) scintillation indexes. These parameters can be estimated form GPS
networks or from a single GNSS station.
We are developing software tools to derive magnitudes of those
ionospheric parameters in a very challenging real-time single station mode.
Some of the modules, like e.g. calculation of S4, TEC and ROT, are already
validated and some others are still in the testing phase. The tools are
needed in order to detect and to analyze ionospheric perturbations in real-
or near- real time and to investigate if some new approaches for generation
of navigation-corrections can be developed. Our main goal is to provide such
corrections, or at least warning messages on ionospheric irregularities, for
near-real-time (or even real-time) single user receiver based processing,
like e.g. single station PPP (Precise
Point Positioning). Within the
TRANSMIT project, participation in the development and operation of
PanEuropean network is foreseen. The network covers mostly European area, but
it is planned to extend it to the south until the equator. Thus, the
Techniche Universitat Berlin (TUB) deploy its monitoring station in Ethiopia
(equatorial area), where ionospheric anomalies occur more often and are
stronger then in the midlatitudes. In this paper our software, and very first
results from the operating TUB/TRANSMIT station in Ethiopia (temporary
integrated into the PanEuropean network) will be presented. |
13 |
Poster |
|
2D Monitoring of Midlatitude
Ionospheric Parameters by Using IRI-Plas-GK |
|
|
|
Arikan, F1; Deviren, M N1; Gulyaeva, T2 |
|
|
|
1HACETTEPE
UNIVERSITY; 2IZMIRAN |
|
|
|
Ionosphere is an important layer
of atmosphere that lies between 100 km and 1000 km altitude. Ionosphere is
also important for HF and satellite communications, space-based navigation,
positioning and guidance systems. Solar, geomagnetic, gravitational and
seismic activities cause variations in ionosphere. Total Electron Content
(TEC) is one of the main observables to monitor the variability of
ionosphere. International Reference Ionosphere Extended to Plasmasphere
(IRI-Plas) is accepted by International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) as the standard model of ionosphere. IRI-Plas TEC provides the TEC up
to GPS satellite height that represents the background ionosphere. For a
given location, time and date, IRI-Plas provides the estimates of the electron
density, TEC, electron temperature, ion temperature, and ion composition
based on the monthly averages. In IRI-Plas, TEC data can be also provided
externally as input for the proper scaling of topside and plasmasphere
extensions. In this study IRI-Plas is further modified to assimilate
ionosonde foF2 and hmF2 estimates along with GPS-TEC, at chosen locations in
a region to produce a 2-D map of desired ionospheric parameters such as foF2,
hmF2, plasma frequency at a given height or height of a specific electron
density distribution. The 2-D map is automatically drawn using Universal
Kriging with Linear Trend that employs Matern Function for semivariogram. The
Matern function coefficients are extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization
technique. To monitor the ionospheric parameters (TEC, height, frequency,
electron density, ion concentration, ion and electron temperature) with
respect to each other, Modified IRI-Plas with Kriging, IRI-Plas-GK is
prepared by IONOLAB. Thus, high resolution space-time automatic maps of
ionospheric parameters can be used to model the ionosphere and investigate
the effects of Space Weather. This study is supported by the joint grant from
TUBITAK 112E568 and RFBR 13-02-91370-CT_a. |
14 |
Poster |
|
Distribution Of Modelling
Spatial Processes Using Geostatistical Analysis |
|
|
|
Grynyshyna-Poliuga, O1; Stanislawska, I1 |
|
|
|
1Space
Research Centre Polish Academy of Science |
|
|
|
The Geostatistical Analyst uses
sample points taken at different locations in a landscape and creates
(interpolates) a continuous surface. The Geostatistical Analyst provides two
groups of interpolation techniques: deterministic and geostatistical. All methods
rely on the similarity of nearby sample points to create the surface.
Deterministic techniques use mathematical functions for interpolation.
Geostatistics relies on both statistical and mathematical methods, which can
be used to create surfaces and assess the uncertainty of the predictions. The
first step in geostatistical analysis is variography: computing and modelling
a semivariogram. A semivariogram is one of the significant functions to
indicate spatial correlation in observations measured at sample locations. It
is commonly represented as a graph that shows the variance in measure with
distance between all pairs of sampled locations. Such a graph is helpful to
build a mathematical model that describes the variability of the measure with
location. Modeling of relationship among sample locations to indicate the
variability of the measure with distance of separation is called
semivariogram modelling. It is applied to applications involving estimating
the value of a measure at a new location. Our work presents the analysis of
the data following the steps as given below: identification of data set
periods, constructing and modelling the empirical semivariogram for single
location and using the Kriging mapping function as modelling of TEC maps in
mid-latitude during disturbed and quiet days. Based on the semivariogram,
weights for the kriging interpolation are estimated. Additional observations
do, in general, not provide relevant extra information to the interpolation,
because the spatial correlation is well described with the semivariogram. |
15 |
Poster |
|
Galileo Robust Tracking
Algorithms Under Ionospheric Scintillation |
|
|
|
Vuckovic, M |
|
|
|
University of Nova Gorica |
|
|
|
The presence of the free
electrons in the ionosphere may affect the propagation of radio waves such as
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals causing rapid temporal
fluctuations in both amplitude and phase. This phenomenon, known as
scintillation, can affect the performance of the GNSS receivers decreasing
the final accuracy and, in a worst case, leading to the total loss of lock.
The number of the free electrons varies in complex manner with geographical
location, time, season solar and magnetic activity causing negative impact on
GNSS systems especially in the equatorial and polar regions where a very high
scintillation activity may occur. On
the other hand, the GNSS signals have been used for measuring the
scintillation effects for decades. Design and implementation of the new GNSS
systems, such as European Galileo system, should bring more robust signals
and thus improve sensitivity of the propagating signals in presence of
scintillation. In a bid to develop a
state of the art tools to mitigate the ionospheric effects to GNSS a Marie
Curie Initial Training Network titled Training Research and Applications
Network to Support the Mitigation of Ionospheric Threats (TRANSMIT) was
proposed and founded by European Commotion. Furthermore, in a scope of the
TRANSMIT project a special sub-project call “Scientific and Industrial
Applications Reliant on GNSS” was developed to bring some novel methods
capable of mitigating the ionospheric effects at receiver level. According to
this, currently available Galileo signals collected at equatorial region were
used in order to investigate the ionospheric impact on Galileo signals. A few
attempts have been done experimenting with different tracking algorithms.
Except traditional third order Phase Lock Loop (PLL) a Kalman Filter (KF) was
implemented into a software receiver and in-phase and quadrature-phase
samples of the prompt correlator were used to estimate two typically used
scintillation parameters called, S4 index and SigmaPhi index. As described in
[1], real data were used to verify the results obtained in this study. [1] Susi, M. et al., “Design of a robust
receiver architecture for scintillation monitoring”, submitted to IEE ION
PLAN Conference 2014, Monterey, California. |
|
|