Session - Space Weather Challenges for Resource Exploitation
Magnar G. Johnsen, Knut Stanley Jacobsen
Space Weather affects resource exploitation operations at all latitudes. However, in particular, as previously unavailable high latitude regions of Earth gets accessible owing to changes in the climate, resource exploitation operations will become more common in and close to the auroral zone. For instance geomagnetic surveying and geomagnetic navigation during horizontal drilling sees challenges caused by frequent and large disturbances in the geomagnetic field caused by auroral electrojets in the high latitude ionosphere. Also any operation dependent on precision satellite navigation is affected owing to large and time-dependent, horizontal gradients and irregularities in the electron density associated with auroral precipitation and polar cap patches and blobs. This session addresses the scientific background of ionospheric/space weather effects on resource exploitation operations as well as how these effects poses challenges for operators. Furthermore, how these challenges are approached and solved will be addressed.
Tuesday November 18, 09:00-13:00, room Mosane
Talks
9:00 am |
The Accuracy of Extrapolated
Magnetic Observatory Measurements for MWD in the Arctic |
|
Clarke, E1; Billingham, L1; Beggan, C1; Turbitt, C1 |
|
British Geological Survey |
|
The recent trend of increased
hydrocarbon drilling activity at high geomagnetic latitudes, in locations
such as Alaska, Canada and the Barents Sea, is expected to continue in the
coming years. At such locations, maintaining the desired accuracies in extended-reach
drilling can be a much greater challenge than elsewhere in the world and for
Measurement While Drilling (MWD) operations, where gyroscopic methods may not
be an option, the use of geomagnetic referencing is essential. In order to
reach challenging targets and avoid well collisions, it is important to
estimate the uncertainties as accurately as possible as well as to reduce
these uncertainties, where possible.
Disturbances in the Earth’s magnetic field (Bd) caused by currents
flowing in the ionosphere and magnetosphere can significantly perturb the
strength and direction of the magnetic field measured down hole. During
magnetic storms variation in azimuth of several degrees over a short period
of time can occur. It is well established that these effects are on average
greatest at higher geomagnetic latitudes such as those nearer the auroral
electrojets. Even during geomagnetic quiet times, the daily range of total
field intensity, azimuth (declination) and dip angles (inclination) at high
latitude can exceed desired threshold accuracies for MWD. To account for these variations at the
drill site, real-time magnetic field measurements from nearby geomagnetic
observatories are often applied. As
many of the drilling campaigns are off-shore or in remote locations it is
usually not possible to measure the Earth’s magnetic field near the drilling
locations to the accuracies required. Sufficient accuracy can, however, be
obtained at established magnetic observatories and Bd can be extrapolated
from those measurements to the drill sites. We show examples of where this
has been successfully applied, with estimates of Bd being combined with
estimates of the other field sources for optimum accuracy. Other sources,
collectively termed here as the undisturbed magnetic field, Bu , are from the
Earth’s core and lithosphere as well as the ever present quiet magnetospheric
fields, and can be estimated from global and local models combined. However the uncertainties in the reference
field estimates grow as the distance between the observatory and drill site
increases. The question for survey management teams and operators is how far
can Bd be reliably extrapolated whilst still improving reference field
estimates at the drill site? We
examine this question by investigating the effect of distance on the
extrapolation of Bd in both longitudinal and latitudinal directions. We
analyse data from high-latitude pairs of observatories and variometer
stations and examine the uncertainties resulting from the application of
magnetic field measurements at one location in estimating the disturbances at
another. We quantify the uncertainties in the estimates of magnetic field
strength and direction as a function of geomagnetic latitude. Sites are
chosen at a variety of separations, latitudes and longitudes to allow diverse
scenarios to be examined. In addition, by considering data over periods of
more than 11 years, we are able to study seasonal, annual and solar cycle
effects. |
9:20 am |
Geomagnetic Variations along
Concurrent Latitudes due to Ionospheric Currents |
|
Edvardsen, I1; Gullikstad Johnsen , M2; Løvhaug, U P2 |
|
1The
Arctic University of Norway and Baker Hughes; 2UiT - The Arctic University of Norway |
|
The geomagnetic field often
experiences large fluctuations, especially at high latitudes in the auroral
zone. This poses challenges for companies involved in resource exploitation
there. It is widely known that the geomagnetic activity generally increases
with increasing latitude and that the largest fluctuations are caused by
substorm processes happening almost every night. In principle the magnitude of geomagnetic
disturbances from two identical substorms along concurrent geomagnetic
latitudes, at different local times, will be the same. However, as a
combination of the chosen coordinate system and the background geomagnetic
field we may anticipate that the signature of a substorm will vary as
function of geographic longitude. In
order to investigate and quantify this statement, we apply a simple 3D model
of Earth magnetic field and use line currents to simulate geomagnetic
substorms of different morphologies and at different local times. The results
of this simulation effort are discussed in context of resource exploitation
in the arctic. We also attempt to identify and quantify areas along the
auroral zone where there is a potential for increased space weather challenges
compared to other areas. |
09:40 am |
ESA SSA - Service Supporting
Resource Exploitation System Operators (RESOSS) |
|
Johnsen, M G1; Jacobsen, K S2 |
|
1Universityo
of Tromsø; 2Norwegian
Mapping Authority |
|
As part of the ESA SSA program
preparatory phase project SN-VI Provision of Space Weather Additional
Services led by Rhea Group, Tromsø Geophysical Observatory and the Norwegian
Mapping Authority are developing a Service Supporting Resource Exploitation System
Operators (RESOSS). The RESOSS service
shall provide near real-time information about geomagnetic disturbances which
primarily affect directional drilling and aeromagnetic surveys, and
ionospheric disturbances which primarily affect GNSS-based services. The RESOSS service will provide these two
independent service components as parts of a single service. The RESOSS
service will be aimed at a broader user base, and will introduce existing end
users of the detailed service components to additional available related
service components which should be of interest and benefit to them. Feedback from the existing end users of
the service components will be crucial in the evaluations and refinement of
the RESOSS service to be developed.
The rationale behind the effort as well as the current status of the
development of the service will be presented. |
10:00 am |
The Geospace Monitoring Based On Yamal
Geophysical Network For Resource Exploitation |
|
Zaitsev, A1; Mazharov, A2; Petrov, V1; Petrukovich, A3 |
|
1Pushkov
Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation; 2Yamal-Nenetz Autonomous
Region, Salekhard, Russia; 3Institute of Space Research |
|
Since 1972 we work to develop
the distributed ground-based instrument array along 145 Geomagnetic Meridian.
At 1991 the network was destroyed and now is the time to restore it. First of all new possibilities appeared in
Western Siberia on Yamal peninsula as such region become the well-developed
area with industrial infrastructure. Second point is that high-tech systems
are affected by extraterrestrial influence and the space weather become as
the factor of sustainable development for any practical business in high
latitudes. Arrays of ground magnetometers provide a powerful tool for
monitoring rapidly varying magnetospheric and ionospheric processes over
extended regions. The global
systems as SuperDARN, SuperMAG and AMPER allow to get global information
about of real magnetospheric processes. But still we need local systems which
gave us more details about space-related processes in vicinity of the
observational points. Most popular service is the auroral forecast and the
local magnetic variations. In practice high demands are the correction of
magnetic navigation of instruments for wellbore positioning in the directional drilling. Another point is
accuracy of GPS receivers which provide the capability to map the overlying
ionosphere and to investigate the effects of solar storms on communication
and navigation systems. The set of sensors as GPS receivers, riometers, VLF-receivers,
optical instruments, etc. along local magnetic meridians will display
time-space resolution which is not available in data of global networks. Now in Yamal peninsula we have 4 points of
observatories, another 3 will be installed during 2014. Also we have some
geophysical prospecting data which might be used for research programs. In
view of coming space projects as SWARM, RSBP, RESONANCE, MMS we have a
perfect prospects for study of magnetospheric processes on all levels from
ground to the outer space above Yamal area. The special attention will be
provided to the observatory on Belyi Island which will include the complex of
instruments from seismic devices to atmosphere and ionosphere sounders. The coordinated program “Polar Geophysics
of Yamal” is supported by Russian Academy of Science and many institutes and
universities. At April 14-16, 20134 we held the International Science and
Application Conference – POLAR 2014 – “Polar Geophysics of Yamal:
observations, instruments, data bases and information systems related to the
Oil and Gas industry”. The integration of advanced software and information
technology will allow us to use the techniques to enable the deployment of
large scale instrumentation networks. We hope that ground-based
instrumentation will provide real-time data for a wide variety of research,
applications, and educational users. |
10:20 am |
Russian Network of Geophysical
Observations in Arctic and Antarctic Assigned to the Space Weather Monitoring |
|
Troshichev, O1; Janzhura, A1 |
|
1Arctic
and Antarctic Research Institute |
|
The Roshydromet network of
geophysical observations includes 11 stations in Arctic and 5 stations in
Antarctic. Stations are equipped with magnetometers, riometers and
ionosounders. The magnetic data from 5 stations located in the auroral zone
(Amderma, Dikson, Cape Chelyuskin, Tiksi, Pebek) are used for calculation of
the planetary AE/AL/AU indices. Data from Antarctic station Vostok serve as a
basis for derivation of the polar cap magnetic activity index (PC). In last
years the Arctic network was subjected to essential reconstruction to ensure
availability of the current geophysical data from remote stations in Arctic
and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI). Renovation includes construction of
new buildings at polar stations, deployment of the satellite communication
modules and arrangement of new acquisition system at stations. A real-time information on geophysical
processes in polar regions is very important for goals of Space Weather
monitoring. The modern communication systems and computer technology makes it
possible to collect and process the data from remote sites without
significant delays. A new acquisition equipment based on microprocessor
modules and reliable in hush climatic conditions has been deployed at the
Russian geophysical stations in Arctic and Antarctic. As a result, now we
have a contemporary system for on-line collecting and transmitting the
geophysical data from remote stations to the Polar Geophysical Center
arranged at AARI. The Polar Geophysical Center performs the data processing
and analyzing to monitor the space weather characteristics such as: total
state of magnetosphere, geomagnetic activity in the auroral zone, state of
polar and auroral ionosphere, conditions for radiowave propagations. It is though that this information should
be desirable for resource exploitation operations carried out in Arctic area. |
10:40 pm |
Maritime user Requirements at
High Latitudes - First Results from the MARENOR Project |
|
Behlke, R |
|
Polar Science and Guiding |
|
The ionosphere at high latitudes
is characterised by a great variety of spatial and temporal variations that
influence radio signals. In addition to navigation solutions that are based
on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), satellite communication
systems also suffer from ionospheric degradation. This is worsened by harsh
weather conditions, insufficient coverage by geostationary satellites and the
absence of land-based augmentation infrastructure. Climate change will lead to a decrease in
sea ice extent and thus to an increased use of trans-polar shipping routes,
presence of gas and oil industries in the High Arctic and higher focus on
Search-and-Rescue (SAR) as well as sovereignty issues. These moments usually
require navigation and communication solutions that are accurate and
reliable. We describe requirements
presented by industrial operators on and around Svalbard. In addition, we
present the MARENOR project that aims on evaluating navigation and
communication systems at high latitudes including first results. |
11:00 pm |
Fugro offshore positioning:
sailing through the solar maximum |
|
Visser, Hans1; Memarzadeh, Yahya1; de Jong, Kees1 |
|
1Fugro
Intersite B.V |
|
Fugro provides global GNSS
augmentation services for the offshore industry using a dedicated and highly
redundant infrastructure. After a brief introduction of these services, we
will give an overview of the effects of the current solar cycle on precise positioning
results in areas such as Brazil, Africa, India and northern Scandinavia. We
will in particular focus on the effects of the recent February 2014
Ionospheric storm. The effects can be
summarized as follows: 1) Ionospheric disturbances on GNSS single-frequency
services. 2) L-band communication outages for the 10 geostationary satellite
links Fugro operates. 3) Ionospheric
scintillations on GNSS signals in the equatorial and auroral region. Possible solutions to mitigate these
effects will also be discussed, such as: 1) Removal of gross errors using
statistical techniques. 2) Increasing the number of GNSS measurements by
lowering the satellite elevation mask. 3) Use of multiple GNSS
constellations. Fugro recently
launched an ionospheric scintillation prediction service, which can forecast
scintillation for the next 24 hours.
It will help Fugro’s clients with the planning of large offshore
operations such as rig moves. Results from this new service will be shown. A
new scintillation index for GNSS users will be proposed. |
|
|